Proxy voting Policies
Align Governance Strategies with Best Practices
Understand Glass Lewis’ Proxy Voting Policies to Shape Governance Programs.
.avif)
Institutional investors navigate complex mandates and regulations. Understanding Glass Lewis' Voting Policies helps companies anticipate investor behavior, address concerns, and make smarter governance decisions.
Key Features and Benefits
How Our Benchmark Policy Construction Process Works
Each year, we conduct an extensive review process to update our Proxy Voting Policies, incorporating input from issuer engagement, client calls and roundtables, global and local policy initiatives, and stakeholder feedback.
In addition, our global research team reviews regulatory changes, market trends, regional best practices, and industry guidelines. We also welcome feedback on our policies via our website. Key developments are integrated into our Voting Policies, published annually in November, and apply to meetings held from January of the following year.
Related Products and Services


Battle Scars on Boards: Gov Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Battle Scars on Boards: Gov Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Skin in the Game: Rem Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Skin in the Game: Rem Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Premium Brands Holdings Corporation
By bundling two extremely different proposals into a single vote, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation is arguably disenfranchising not only shareholders but also the company itself – and exposing its board to potential scrutiny.


Premium Brands Holdings Corporation
By bundling two extremely different proposals into a single vote, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation is arguably disenfranchising not only shareholders but also the company itself – and exposing its board to potential scrutiny.