Report Feedback Statement
Share Feedback on Glass Lewis' Corporate Governance Research
Investors can share their views on Glass Lewis’ Corporate Governance Research through our Report Feedback Statement Service.

Investors, especially in contentious situations, often need to use multiple channels to reach voting decision-makers. Glass Lewis’ innovative Report Feedback Statement (RFS) allows them to share their perspective alongside our governance research before votes are cast.
Key Features and Benefits
How It Works
The RFS is accessible from the front page of each Proxy Paper research report and allows investors to consider that information ahead of voting decisions.
Clients that have previously downloaded the Proxy Paper research report are notified by email when a RFS is available. Previous versions of the report, without the RFS, will no longer be available on Viewpoint or any other Glass Lewis platforms.
.avif)


Battle Scars on Boards: Gov Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Battle Scars on Boards: Gov Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Skin in the Game: Rem Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Skin in the Game: Rem Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Premium Brands Holdings Corporation
By bundling two extremely different proposals into a single vote, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation is arguably disenfranchising not only shareholders but also the company itself – and exposing its board to potential scrutiny.


Premium Brands Holdings Corporation
By bundling two extremely different proposals into a single vote, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation is arguably disenfranchising not only shareholders but also the company itself – and exposing its board to potential scrutiny.