Comprehensive Corporate Governance Solutions
In-depth research and multiple voting policies to strengthen your governance approach.
Institutional investors need to make informed proxy voting decisions but researching thousands of companies and maintaining policies is resource intensive. Glass Lewis' Corporate Governance Solutions help investors enhance decision-making, streamline workflows and support fiduciary compliance.
Corporate Governance Solutions
Global Coverage, Local Expertise
Access in-depth analysis on 30,000+ shareholder meetings across more than 100 markets annually.
Timely Research Delivery
Benefit from more time to make vote decisions with research reports delivered ~3 weeks in advance of shareholder meetings.
Align with Best Practices
Implement industry-leading governance practices with our in-depth analysis and market-specific policies.
Streamline Governance Processes
Enhance efficiency with clear and consistent research and voting policies and customized stewardship services aligned to your goals.
Product Offerings
Our Corporate Governance Solutions span a wide variety of actionable research insights and voting policies to enhance investors’ decision-making processes.
Corporate Governance Research
In-depth research insights and clear vote recommendations on annual general meeting proposals.
Investment Stewardship
Make informed voting and engagement decisions with world-class research and recommendations.
Controversy Alerts
Actionable, brief risk alerts that prioritize the most controversial ESG issues at upcoming shareholder meetings.
Proxy Voting Policies
Market-specific policy guidelines that inform our vote recommendations on shareholder meeting proposals.
Thematic Policies
Comprehensive proxy voting policy guidelines aligned with regulations and client goals.
Client Custom Policies
Customized voting policies that align with investor objectives.
Glass Lewis offers Corporate Governance Solutions to institutional investors who need to efficiently make informed vote decisions on shareholder proposals, director elections and other corporate matters.
Assessing Shareholder Vote Risks: An Overview of Four Key Challenges for Public Companies
This article outlines how challenges surrounding shareholder voting risk extend beyond the likelihood of a proposal passing or failing, and how a more structured approach to assessing investor signals can support earlier engagement, clearer board reporting, and more informed governance decisions.
Assessing Shareholder Vote Risks: An Overview of Four Key Challenges for Public Companies
This article outlines how challenges surrounding shareholder voting risk extend beyond the likelihood of a proposal passing or failing, and how a more structured approach to assessing investor signals can support earlier engagement, clearer board reporting, and more informed governance decisions.
How Companies and Investors Can Navigate Japan's Revised Corporate Governance Code
This article helps investors navigate Japan's 2026 updated Corporate Governance Code by mapping its requirements to Glass Lewis solutions.
How Companies and Investors Can Navigate Japan's Revised Corporate Governance Code
This article helps investors navigate Japan's 2026 updated Corporate Governance Code by mapping its requirements to Glass Lewis solutions.
Regulatory Issues to Watch in Australia and New Zealand’s 2026 Proxy Season
This article outlines the regulatory trends and developments expected to shape board decision-making and institutional voting across Australia and New Zealand’s 2026 proxy season.
Regulatory Issues to Watch in Australia and New Zealand’s 2026 Proxy Season
This article outlines the regulatory trends and developments expected to shape board decision-making and institutional voting across Australia and New Zealand’s 2026 proxy season.
Four Observations About U.S. Shareholder Proposals in Proxy Season 2026
This article shares four observations about the shareholder proposals that went to vote at U.S. companies this year.
Four Observations About U.S. Shareholder Proposals in Proxy Season 2026
This article shares four observations about the shareholder proposals that went to vote at U.S. companies this year.