Pension Funds
Investment Stewardship Solutions to Help Pension Funds
Customizable engagement services, in-depth governance insights and advanced voting solutions for pension funds.

With their long-term investment horizon, pension funds face unique challenges in meeting the diverse needs of their stakeholders. Glass Lewis provides in-depth research, data, and customized engagement and voting solutions to help pension funds fulfill their compliance obligations and fiduciary responsibilities.
Key Solutions
Our Core Benefits
Fulfill Your Unique Governance Objectives
We offer 8 thematic, 45+ market-specific, and 440+ custom policies, tailored to clients’ objectives.
Manage Regulatory Obligations
Our custom voting and engagement solutions help pension funds meet their mandatory and voluntary obligations while driving meaningful outcomes.
More Time for Decision-Making
Our thoughtful, rigorous proxy research is released ~19 days ahead of a company’s meeting, ensuring asset managers have more time to consider their vote decisions.
Global Coverage with Local Market Context
Gain expert insights on local market practices, with each company evaluated based on its unique circumstances, including performance, size, maturity, governance structure, and shareholder responsiveness.
Improve Your Workflow Productivity
Our cutting-edge voting and engagement platforms streamline complex processes and improve operational efficiency.


The Current Strategic Landscape for Investment Stewardship
Based on findings from the 2026 Investment Stewardship Survey Report, this article covers current engagement priorities, operational approaches to stewardship, criteria for prioritization of engagement themes, and key areas of improvement.


The Current Strategic Landscape for Investment Stewardship
Based on findings from the 2026 Investment Stewardship Survey Report, this article covers current engagement priorities, operational approaches to stewardship, criteria for prioritization of engagement themes, and key areas of improvement.


External Shareholder Nomination Committees in Nordic Market Practice
This article provides an overview of how external nominating committees function and how they differ from board committees.


External Shareholder Nomination Committees in Nordic Market Practice
This article provides an overview of how external nominating committees function and how they differ from board committees.


A Conversation About Evaluating AI-Driven Proxy Voting Systems
This discussion serves as a companion to AI and the Fiduciary Test, the first in a series of white papers on enterprise-level, investment-grade AI in proxy voting.


A Conversation About Evaluating AI-Driven Proxy Voting Systems
This discussion serves as a companion to AI and the Fiduciary Test, the first in a series of white papers on enterprise-level, investment-grade AI in proxy voting.


A Look at France’s Approach to Executive Remuneration Voting
This article sets out the details and background of France’s approach to executive remuneration governance, explores how it compares to regional peers in Europe, and examines shareholder voting data to discuss how this approach works in practice.


A Look at France’s Approach to Executive Remuneration Voting
This article sets out the details and background of France’s approach to executive remuneration governance, explores how it compares to regional peers in Europe, and examines shareholder voting data to discuss how this approach works in practice.
.png)