Report Feedback Statement
Share Feedback on Glass Lewis' Corporate Governance Research
Companies can present their views on Glass Lewis' Corporate Governance Research to investors through our Report Feedback Statement service.
.avif)
Glass Lewis' Report Feedback Statement (RFS) enables companies to communicate their perspectives on our corporate governance research to our 1,300+ institutional investor clients. This real-time feedback offers investors valuable context to make timely and more informed voting decisions.
Key Features and Benefits
.avif)
The RFS is accessible on the front page of each Proxy Paper report, ensuring investors can review it before voting decisions.
Institutional clients who previously downloaded the report are notified by email when the RFS is added, with prior versions removed from all Glass Lewis platforms.
Related Products and Services


Battle Scars on Boards: Gov Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Battle Scars on Boards: Gov Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Skin in the Game: Rem Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Skin in the Game: Rem Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Premium Brands Holdings Corporation
By bundling two extremely different proposals into a single vote, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation is arguably disenfranchising not only shareholders but also the company itself – and exposing its board to potential scrutiny.


Premium Brands Holdings Corporation
By bundling two extremely different proposals into a single vote, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation is arguably disenfranchising not only shareholders but also the company itself – and exposing its board to potential scrutiny.