Report Feedback Statement
Share Feedback on Glass Lewis' Corporate Governance Research
Companies can present their views on Glass Lewis' Corporate Governance Research to investors through our Report Feedback Statement service.
Glass Lewis' Report Feedback Statement (RFS) enables companies to communicate their perspectives on our corporate governance research to our 1,300+ institutional investor clients. This real-time feedback offers investors valuable context to make timely and more informed voting decisions.
Key Features and Benefits
The RFS is accessible on the front page of each Proxy Paper report, ensuring investors can review it before voting decisions.
Institutional clients who previously downloaded the report are notified by email when the RFS is added, with prior versions removed from all Glass Lewis platforms.
Related Products and Services
Market Brief: Examining the SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Rule as a Governance Proposal
This article provides a brief overview of the governance and stewardship debate over reporting frequency.
Market Brief: Examining the SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Rule as a Governance Proposal
This article provides a brief overview of the governance and stewardship debate over reporting frequency.
Stewardship in Action: Engagement Snapshots on Executive Pay Incentives and Peer Groups
This article shows how investment stewardship engagement with a biotech company and an advanced analytics company led to positive outcomes for institutional shareholders.
Stewardship in Action: Engagement Snapshots on Executive Pay Incentives and Peer Groups
This article shows how investment stewardship engagement with a biotech company and an advanced analytics company led to positive outcomes for institutional shareholders.
Tracking Shareholder Proposals and Company Exclusions: Mid-Season Observations
How has the SEC’s new approach to no-action requests impacted the shareholder proposal landscape?
Tracking Shareholder Proposals and Company Exclusions: Mid-Season Observations
How has the SEC’s new approach to no-action requests impacted the shareholder proposal landscape?
Market Brief: What Proxy Voting for Third-Party Tokenized Stocks and ETFs Might Mean for Governance
This article examines how proxy voting for third-party tokenized stocks and ETFs could reshape governance. Though it creates new ways for investors to participate in proxy voting, it also raises unresolved governance questions around ownership rights and voting eligibility, transparency, intermediary accountability, and fiduciary responsibility.
Market Brief: What Proxy Voting for Third-Party Tokenized Stocks and ETFs Might Mean for Governance
This article examines how proxy voting for third-party tokenized stocks and ETFs could reshape governance. Though it creates new ways for investors to participate in proxy voting, it also raises unresolved governance questions around ownership rights and voting eligibility, transparency, intermediary accountability, and fiduciary responsibility.