Proxy voting Policies
Enhance Decision-Making with Consistent Proxy Voting Policies
Ensure your governance decisions reflect industry best practices with Glass Lewis' Proxy Voting Policies.

A comprehensive voting policy underpins consistent and transparent governance decisions. Glass Lewis' Proxy Voting Policies offer institutional investors market-specific guidelines for voting on annual general meeting proposals, helping them meet fiduciary obligations and regulatory requirements.
Key Features and Benefits
How Our Policy Construction Process Works
Each year, we conduct an extensive review process to update our Proxy Voting Policies, incorporating input from issuer engagement, client calls and roundtables, global and local policy initiatives, and stakeholder feedback.
In addition, our global research team reviews regulatory changes, market trends, regional best practices, and industry guidelines. We also welcome feedback on our policies via our website. Key developments are integrated into our Voting Policies, published annually in November, and apply to meetings held from January of the following year.
Related Products and Services


Battle Scars on Boards: Gov Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Battle Scars on Boards: Gov Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Skin in the Game: Rem Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Skin in the Game: Rem Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Premium Brands Holdings Corporation
By bundling two extremely different proposals into a single vote, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation is arguably disenfranchising not only shareholders but also the company itself – and exposing its board to potential scrutiny.


Premium Brands Holdings Corporation
By bundling two extremely different proposals into a single vote, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation is arguably disenfranchising not only shareholders but also the company itself – and exposing its board to potential scrutiny.