Proxy voting Policies
Enhance Decision-Making with Consistent Proxy Voting Policies
Ensure your governance decisions reflect industry best practices with Glass Lewis' Proxy Voting Policies.
A comprehensive voting policy underpins consistent and transparent governance decisions. Glass Lewis' Proxy Voting Policies offer institutional investors market-specific guidelines for voting on annual general meeting proposals, helping them meet fiduciary obligations and regulatory requirements.
Key Features and Benefits
How Our Policy Construction Process Works
Each year, we conduct an extensive review process to update our Proxy Voting Policies, incorporating input from issuer engagement, client calls and roundtables, global and local policy initiatives, and stakeholder feedback.
In addition, our global research team reviews regulatory changes, market trends, regional best practices, and industry guidelines. We also welcome feedback on our policies via our website. Key developments are integrated into our Voting Policies, published annually in November, and apply to meetings held from January of the following year.
Related Products and Services
Glass Lewis Response to TX SB 2337
As part of a campaign to attract companies to relocate to, incorporate in, and list on a new Texas-based exchange, the Texas legislature is rushing through a number of corporate governance measures.
Glass Lewis Response to TX SB 2337
As part of a campaign to attract companies to relocate to, incorporate in, and list on a new Texas-based exchange, the Texas legislature is rushing through a number of corporate governance measures.
Glass Lewis Submission on APRA’s Governance Review Discussion Paper
Glass Lewis recently provided a submission to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in response to its Governance Review Discussion Paper.
Glass Lewis Submission on APRA’s Governance Review Discussion Paper
Glass Lewis recently provided a submission to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in response to its Governance Review Discussion Paper.
Fuji Media & Keisei Electric Railway
Japanese companies continue to face heightened levels of shareholder activism.This week, investors have raised questions about board composition, governance practices and the financial/capital strategy at both Fuji Media and Keisei Electric Railway.
Fuji Media & Keisei Electric Railway
Japanese companies continue to face heightened levels of shareholder activism.This week, investors have raised questions about board composition, governance practices and the financial/capital strategy at both Fuji Media and Keisei Electric Railway.