Investment Banks
Leverage Actionable Insights to Navigate M&A and Contested Situations
Access governance research and data to support client needs and strengthen advisory strategies.
.avif)
Investment banks must provide strategic guidance on M&A, shareholder activism, and governance risks while navigating evolving regulations. Glass Lewis' governance research and data helps banks anticipate investor reactions, refine deal strategies, and enhance shareholder engagement.
Key Solutions
Our Core Benefits
Enhance Due Diligence
Harness 20+ years of governance research and data to evaluate director qualifications, related-party transactions, and insider affiliations, which helps to uncover opportunities and mitigate risks.
Strengthen Deal Narratives
Access an extensive library of proxy voting policies, thematic and annual reports covering critical global and regional governance developments to enhance deal narratives.
Anticipate Voting Trends
Refine deal strategies and mitigate risks by leveraging Glass Lewis’ governance and special situations research and data.


Battle Scars on Boards: Gov Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Battle Scars on Boards: Gov Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Skin in the Game: Rem Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Skin in the Game: Rem Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Premium Brands Holdings Corporation
By bundling two extremely different proposals into a single vote, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation is arguably disenfranchising not only shareholders but also the company itself – and exposing its board to potential scrutiny.


Premium Brands Holdings Corporation
By bundling two extremely different proposals into a single vote, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation is arguably disenfranchising not only shareholders but also the company itself – and exposing its board to potential scrutiny.