Proxy voting Policies
Align Governance Strategies with Best Practices
Understand Glass Lewis’ Proxy Voting Policies to Shape Governance Programs.
Institutional investors navigate complex mandates and regulations. Understanding Glass Lewis' Voting Policies helps companies anticipate investor behavior, address concerns, and make smarter governance decisions.
Key Features and Benefits
How Our Benchmark Policy Construction Process Works
Each year, we conduct an extensive review process to update our Proxy Voting Policies, incorporating input from issuer engagement, client calls and roundtables, global and local policy initiatives, and stakeholder feedback.
In addition, our global research team reviews regulatory changes, market trends, regional best practices, and industry guidelines. We also welcome feedback on our policies via our website. Key developments are integrated into our Voting Policies, published annually in November, and apply to meetings held from January of the following year.
Related Products and Services
.png)
Pay for Performance: An Updated Model for the Australian Market
This article covers how Glass Lewis has enhanced its Australian pay for performance methodology to bring greater clarity, consistency, and transparency to evaluations of executive pay relative to company performance.
Pay for Performance: An Updated Model for the Australian Market
This article covers how Glass Lewis has enhanced its Australian pay for performance methodology to bring greater clarity, consistency, and transparency to evaluations of executive pay relative to company performance.
How Plurality Voting Allows Directors to Stay on the Board Without Majority Support
This article looks at the drivers and implications of majority-unsupported directors, with a focus on the use of plurality voting and governance practices that undermine board accountability.
How Plurality Voting Allows Directors to Stay on the Board Without Majority Support
This article looks at the drivers and implications of majority-unsupported directors, with a focus on the use of plurality voting and governance practices that undermine board accountability.
Free Float, Ownership Transparency and Governance Quality: What Indonesia’s Market Stress Revealed
This article examines recent volatility in Indonesia’s equity market following MSCI’s investability and ownership transparency concerns in early 2026. It considers broader governance implications, drawing on OECD observations regarding ownership concentration and minority shareholder influence.
Free Float, Ownership Transparency and Governance Quality: What Indonesia’s Market Stress Revealed
This article examines recent volatility in Indonesia’s equity market following MSCI’s investability and ownership transparency concerns in early 2026. It considers broader governance implications, drawing on OECD observations regarding ownership concentration and minority shareholder influence.
