Engagement Letters and Resources
Identify Key Governance and ESG Issues Important to Investors
Access Your Investors' Engagement Letters Via Glass Lewis' Governance Hub.

As regulatory requirements and investor expectations grow, effective shareholder engagement is more important than ever. Glass Lewis’ investor engagement letters on Governance Hub help you identify key shareholder concerns, enabling you to craft timely and effective responses.
Key Features and Benefits
Proactively Address Concerns
Leveraging the Engagement Letters on Governance Hub allows you to proactively address concerns, helping to mitigate risks and strengthen shareholder relationships.
Understand Global Engagement Trends
Access reports detailing focus list selection, engagement themes, and case studies from our Active Stewardship Engagement Program.
Strengthen Governance and ESG Practices
Leverage engagement reports to identify peer challenges, understand areas for improvement, or showcase your company’s competitive advantages.

Market-Leading Governance Platform
Our Engagement Letters and Resources are available via our user-friendly governance platform, Governance Hub. Clients can also access our corporate governance research thought leadership, and policy guidelines through the platform.
Overview of Glass Lewis' Stewardship Solutions
Glass Lewis' Stewardship team engages with hundreds of issuers globally each year on behalf of institutional investors. Below are the engagement programs we offer.

Custom Engagement Services
Glass Lewis identifies historical issues using ESG analysis and extensive vote data,
helping investors prioritize key engagements to better align efforts with proxy voting decisions.
helping investors prioritize key engagements to better align efforts with proxy voting decisions.
Active Stewardship Engagement Services
Glass Lewis’ Active Stewardship Engagement Program enables investors to maximize their engagement efficiency and impact by signing on to our program. Our focus list of 200+ global companies cover a wide range of sectors and themes. Focus list companies are selected through a comprehensive and structured screening process of ESG data, Controversy Alerts, and AGM vote result analysis.
Related Products and Services


Meeting Notes From Japan: Examples of Shareholder Activism
Explore recent shareholder activism trends in Japan with three examples of notable meetings where investors influenced the AGM agenda in 2025.


Meeting Notes From Japan: Examples of Shareholder Activism
Explore recent shareholder activism trends in Japan with three examples of notable meetings where investors influenced the AGM agenda in 2025.


Supporting Effective Investment Stewardship Part Two: Unifying Engagement Technology and Programs
This article explores how purpose-built technology and external engagement support can help investors with more structured, scalable tracking of engagement activities and outcomes.


Supporting Effective Investment Stewardship Part Two: Unifying Engagement Technology and Programs
This article explores how purpose-built technology and external engagement support can help investors with more structured, scalable tracking of engagement activities and outcomes.


Guide: Anticipating and Addressing Shareholder Views on Executive Pay
This guide explains how companies can take a methodical approach to pre-season executive pay planning.


Guide: Anticipating and Addressing Shareholder Views on Executive Pay
This guide explains how companies can take a methodical approach to pre-season executive pay planning.


Analyzing Board Composition in the US: What the Latest Data Says on Director Independence, Commitments and Diversity
This article provides an overview of the board trends that we observed, covering board independence, overcommitment, and gender, racial and ethnic diversity, and discussion of how these findings align with the results of our 2025 Policy Survey.


Analyzing Board Composition in the US: What the Latest Data Says on Director Independence, Commitments and Diversity
This article provides an overview of the board trends that we observed, covering board independence, overcommitment, and gender, racial and ethnic diversity, and discussion of how these findings align with the results of our 2025 Policy Survey.