Executive Compensation Models and Insights
Understand how your company’s compensation is viewed by investors and build pay programs to win shareholder support.
Glass Lewis’ compensation solutions for companies include everything you need to understand how your plans are viewed by institutional investors. With over 20 years of experience analyzing pay, our data, tools and services support benchmarking, pay-for-performance modeling, equity plan design, and more.
Key Features and Benefits
Pay-for-Performance Modeling
Anticipate how pay-for-performance may be assessed, and model alignment outcomes using alternative pay scenarios. Available in North America, Europe, the UK, and Australia in 2026.
Product Offerings
Glass Lewis’ compensation solutions include peer benchmarking, pay-for-performance and equity compensation modeling, and expert advice on equity plans.
Equity Plan Modeling
Evaluate your equity plan against industry best practices and gain data-driven insights to strengthen shareholder support.
Compensation Modeling Platform
Access the pay-for-performance and equity compensation models that inform Glass Lewis’ analysis and recommendations.
Stewardship in Action: Engagement Snapshots on Executive Pay Incentives and Peer Groups
This article shows how investment stewardship engagement with a biotech company and an advanced analytics company led to positive outcomes for institutional shareholders.
Stewardship in Action: Engagement Snapshots on Executive Pay Incentives and Peer Groups
This article shows how investment stewardship engagement with a biotech company and an advanced analytics company led to positive outcomes for institutional shareholders.
Tracking Shareholder Proposals and Company Exclusions: Mid-Season Observations
How has the SEC’s new approach to no-action requests impacted the shareholder proposal landscape?
Tracking Shareholder Proposals and Company Exclusions: Mid-Season Observations
How has the SEC’s new approach to no-action requests impacted the shareholder proposal landscape?
Market Brief: What Proxy Voting for Third-Party Tokenized Stocks and ETFs Might Mean for Governance
This article examines how proxy voting for third-party tokenized stocks and ETFs could reshape governance. Though it creates new ways for investors to participate in proxy voting, it also raises unresolved governance questions around ownership rights and voting eligibility, transparency, intermediary accountability, and fiduciary responsibility.
Market Brief: What Proxy Voting for Third-Party Tokenized Stocks and ETFs Might Mean for Governance
This article examines how proxy voting for third-party tokenized stocks and ETFs could reshape governance. Though it creates new ways for investors to participate in proxy voting, it also raises unresolved governance questions around ownership rights and voting eligibility, transparency, intermediary accountability, and fiduciary responsibility.
The Current Strategic Landscape for Investment Stewardship
Based on findings from the 2026 Investment Stewardship Survey Report, this article covers current engagement priorities, operational approaches to stewardship, criteria for prioritization of engagement themes, and key areas of improvement.
The Current Strategic Landscape for Investment Stewardship
Based on findings from the 2026 Investment Stewardship Survey Report, this article covers current engagement priorities, operational approaches to stewardship, criteria for prioritization of engagement themes, and key areas of improvement.