Proxy Talk: Board Composition and Sustainability Competence
Glass Lewis hosted a proxy talk with Veena Ramani of Ceres to discuss sustainability competence on the board, and Ceres’ new Lead from the Top report on that topic.
With investors putting increased focus on both board composition and sustainability, having the right mix of skills and experience to prepare for the long-term is more important than ever. Ms. Ramani discusses how companies can identify appropriate new candidates and bring existing directors up to speed, and how investors can assess whether companies are taking the steps to become sustainability-competent.
You can listen to the audio here. For more information on the subject, the Lead from the Top report is available at Ceres’ website.
Veena Ramani, Program Director, Capital Market Systems at Ceres
Courteney Keatinge (moderator), Director, Environmental, Social & Governance Research at Glass Lewis
- 0:50 Welcome and introduction
- 2:30 Veena gives background on the Ceres report
- 5:20 Assessing sustainability competence: board skills matrix
- 7:27 Balancing sustainability competence with overall board competence
- 10:50 Can search firms help in identifying untapped diverse candidates?
- 12:40 Sustainability training for existing board members
- 15:11 Once on the board, where can sustainability experts make an impact?
- 17:24 Sustainability advisory councils
- 19:50 Absent a skills matrix, how can investors tell if a board is sustainability competent?
- 21:55 Accessing the Lead from the Top report
- 22:24 Final thoughts: putting sustainability competence into a wider framework of effective board decision-making
- 24:15 Wrap-up & follow up
© 2018 Glass, Lewis & Co., and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
This blog is for informational purposes only and is updated periodically to keep Glass Lewis' clients and other interested parties informed of current corporate governance developments and regulatory trends. The information contained herein should not be construed as legal or investment advice. Glass Lewis analyzes issues it believes may be of interest to its subscribers and makes recommendations as to how Glass Lewis believes institutional shareholders should approach such issues. While Glass Lewis may mention certain companies in its blog postings, Glass Lewis never comments on the investment merits of the securities issued by the subject companies. Therefore, none of the information posted through this blog should be construed as a recommendation to invest in, purchase, or sell any securities or other property. All recommendations stated herein must be construed solely as statements of opinion, and not as statements of fact, and may be revised based on additional information or any other reason at any time.
The information contained in each blog posting is based on publicly available information. While Glass Lewis exercises reasonable care to ensure that all information included in this blog is accurate and is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, no representations or warranties express or implied, are made as to the accuracy or completeness of any information included herein. In addition, Glass Lewis shall not be liable for any losses or damages arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use or inability to use any such information.
Glass Lewis expects readers of its blog possess sufficient experience and knowledge to make their own decisions entirely independent of any information contained in Glass Lewis’ blog postings. Subscribers are ultimately and solely responsible for making their own decisions. This blog is intended to serve as a complementary source of information and analysis for subscribers in making their own decisions and therefore should not be relied on by subscribers as the sole determinant in making decisions.