Proxy Monthly Interview with KT Rabin and Aaron Bertinetti
CEO KT Rabin and Head of Research and Engagement Aaron Bertinetti recently sat down with Proxy Monthly to discuss the latest trends in engagement, and provide some perspective on a proposed bill to regulate proxy advisory firms.
While talking about engagements between Glass Lewis and the companies we cover, Aaron pointed out that Glass Lewis does not meet as a representative of our clients but seeks to get a better understanding of the unique governance situation at each individual company.
“Our analysts are engaging on behalf of Glass Lewis to improve the value of our insights for the benefit of our clients and to achieve mutual understanding, not always agreement, between ourselves and the companies we cover.“
Aaron also mentioned Meetyl, a web-based platform that is changing the way companies engage with institutional investors.
“So where corporate access has traditionally been a portfolio manager paying a broker to arrange meetings with a company’s CEO and other executives, Meetyl directly connects investors to executives and investor relations professionals who are live users indicating their own interests in meeting.”
KT discussed the Proxy Advisory Reform Act currently being considered in the U.S. Congress, pointing out several areas of concern.
“The bill would require us to provide issuers access to our intellectual property, and then force us to provide an audience to their protests in a way which our investor clients do not support and compromises our rights as an independent research firm.”
Read the full interview here.
© 2018 Glass, Lewis & Co., and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
This blog is for informational purposes only and is updated periodically to keep Glass Lewis' clients and other interested parties informed of current corporate governance developments and regulatory trends. The information contained herein should not be construed as legal or investment advice. Glass Lewis analyzes issues it believes may be of interest to its subscribers and makes recommendations as to how Glass Lewis believes institutional shareholders should approach such issues. While Glass Lewis may mention certain companies in its blog postings, Glass Lewis never comments on the investment merits of the securities issued by the subject companies. Therefore, none of the information posted through this blog should be construed as a recommendation to invest in, purchase, or sell any securities or other property. All recommendations stated herein must be construed solely as statements of opinion, and not as statements of fact, and may be revised based on additional information or any other reason at any time.
The information contained in each blog posting is based on publicly available information. While Glass Lewis exercises reasonable care to ensure that all information included in this blog is accurate and is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, no representations or warranties express or implied, are made as to the accuracy or completeness of any information included herein. In addition, Glass Lewis shall not be liable for any losses or damages arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use or inability to use any such information.
Glass Lewis expects readers of its blog possess sufficient experience and knowledge to make their own decisions entirely independent of any information contained in Glass Lewis’ blog postings. Subscribers are ultimately and solely responsible for making their own decisions. This blog is intended to serve as a complementary source of information and analysis for subscribers in making their own decisions and therefore should not be relied on by subscribers as the sole determinant in making decisions.