Peer Group
Submission
Peer Group Submission
Submit self-identified peer groups used for executive compensation benchmarking.
Peer Group Submission
Peer submission windows are open twice annually for publicly traded companies in the U.S. and Canada to submit self-identified peer groups used for their executive compensation benchmarking. Self-disclosed peer groups are incorporated into Glass Lewis’ proprietary methodology which drives our executive compensation assessment and the outcome of our executive compensation model.
Relevant companies are notified by email of biannual open window periods. Opt-in to peer submission communications.
Glass Lewis’ Peer Methodology
Glass Lewis has Glass Lewis has a rigorous, state-of-the-art peer methodology that informs our Pay-for-Performance Model, and our Say on Pay recommendations. Beginning with a company’s self-disclosed peers, Glass Lewis then includes investor views on both industry-based and country-based peers, in addition to the company’s peers-of-peers. This approach ensures additional screens based on corporate revenue, market capitalization, and assets; weightings also consider the source and frequency of confirmation, and peer rankings are based on a strength-of-connection approach that considers all potential peers, not just those resulting from the network effects of corporate disclosures.
Related Products and Services
Tracking Shareholder Proposals and Company Exclusions: Pre-Season Observations
How has the SEC’s new approach to no-action requests impacted the shareholder proposal landscape? It’s a question that Glass Lewis will be monitoring throughout the U.S. proxy season.
Tracking Shareholder Proposals and Company Exclusions: Pre-Season Observations
How has the SEC’s new approach to no-action requests impacted the shareholder proposal landscape? It’s a question that Glass Lewis will be monitoring throughout the U.S. proxy season.
Observations: What the Withdrawal of Big Four Auditors From Sub-Saharan Africa Means for Corporate Governance and Shareholders
This article examines how the retreat of Big Four auditors from Sub-Saharan Africa could reshaping the regional audit landscape and influencing corporate governance and shareholder outcomes over the long term.
Observations: What the Withdrawal of Big Four Auditors From Sub-Saharan Africa Means for Corporate Governance and Shareholders
This article examines how the retreat of Big Four auditors from Sub-Saharan Africa could reshaping the regional audit landscape and influencing corporate governance and shareholder outcomes over the long term.
How One of Japan’s Largest Asset Managers Leveraged a Custom Voting Policy and Engagement Services
Learn how one of Japan’s largest asset managers partnered with Glass Lewis to implement a custom voting policy and a tailored global engagement program.
How One of Japan’s Largest Asset Managers Leveraged a Custom Voting Policy and Engagement Services
Learn how one of Japan’s largest asset managers partnered with Glass Lewis to implement a custom voting policy and a tailored global engagement program.
US AI Oversight Through Three Lenses: Investor Expectations, the S&P 100 and Company-Specific Analysis
This article examines U.S. investor expectations for board oversight of artificial intelligence, analyzes AI governance disclosures among S&P 100 companies, and highlights company-specific approaches to managing AI-related risks and opportunities.
US AI Oversight Through Three Lenses: Investor Expectations, the S&P 100 and Company-Specific Analysis
This article examines U.S. investor expectations for board oversight of artificial intelligence, analyzes AI governance disclosures among S&P 100 companies, and highlights company-specific approaches to managing AI-related risks and opportunities.