Glass Lewis has submitted a response to the Dutch consultation, which ended on February 7, 2019, on a legislative proposal to implement a 250-day bedenktijd (‘thinking period’). The proposal would implement a 250-day thinking period for the supervisory board in the case where shareholders have submitted a proposal to appoint, suspend or terminate the term of a director or in the event that a (hostile) takeover bid is imminent.
As outlined in our response, we believe many shareholders will be extremely concerned by the suspension of fundamental shareholder rights, such as the ability to elect or remove supervisory board members, during the thinking period. We also note that Dutch companies are already well equipped with respect to anti-takeover mechanisms. We are further concerned that the proposed legislation will deprive minority shareholders from a much needed flow of publicly available information around critical decision points.
Although no concrete timeline has yet been proposed for implementation, Glass Lewis will carefully monitor the outcome.
You can download our submission to the consultation below. For more information, contact email@example.com.
© 2019 Glass, Lewis & Co., and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
This blog is for informational purposes only and is updated periodically to keep Glass Lewis' clients and other interested parties informed of current corporate governance developments and regulatory trends. The information contained herein should not be construed as legal or investment advice. Glass Lewis analyzes issues it believes may be of interest to its subscribers and makes recommendations as to how Glass Lewis believes institutional shareholders should approach such issues. While Glass Lewis may mention certain companies in its blog postings, Glass Lewis never comments on the investment merits of the securities issued by the subject companies. Therefore, none of the information posted through this blog should be construed as a recommendation to invest in, purchase, or sell any securities or other property. All recommendations stated herein must be construed solely as statements of opinion, and not as statements of fact, and may be revised based on additional information or any other reason at any time.
The information contained in each blog posting is based on publicly available information. While Glass Lewis exercises reasonable care to ensure that all information included in this blog is accurate and is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, no representations or warranties express or implied, are made as to the accuracy or completeness of any information included herein. In addition, Glass Lewis shall not be liable for any losses or damages arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use or inability to use any such information.
Glass Lewis expects readers of its blog possess sufficient experience and knowledge to make their own decisions entirely independent of any information contained in Glass Lewis’ blog postings. Subscribers are ultimately and solely responsible for making their own decisions. This blog is intended to serve as a complementary source of information and analysis for subscribers in making their own decisions and therefore should not be relied on by subscribers as the sole determinant in making decisions.