Glass Lewis on Worker Participation: An Overview of Employee Ownership and Representation
In the past thirty years, more and more attention has been paid to the effects of employee participation on company performance. What might be the effect of it on long-term company performance? How could increased employee influence affect corporate strategy and decision-making?
There are two main forms through which employees can participate directly to the life of a publicly traded company: through ownership of the company’s shares, and through representation on the board of directors.
Employee ownership usually results from “direct participation plans”, which provide a streamlined (and often discounted, tax-efficient) means for workers to invest in the company, with clearly established caps and conditions. Employee representation on the board of directors means that employees themselves, or a body representing employees, can appoint a representative to sit on the board of directors.
Glass Lewis’ new Worker Participation white paper provides a global overview of both ownership and representation with focus on the European market. We outline the level of participation around the world on a market-by-market basis, and dive deep into how employees are treated in European markets including Germany, France and the UK. Case studies, covering companies such as Rolls-Royce, Volkswagen and Vinci, illustrate the varying approaches taken by different companies and different countries.
As part of our research library, the Worker Participation white paper is available to Glass Lewis clients on Viewpoint and www.glasslewis.net, or you can contact your Client Service Manager. Non-clients who are interested in the report can request a copy by emailing firstname.lastname@example.org.
© 2020 Glass, Lewis & Co., and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
This blog is for informational purposes only and is updated periodically to keep Glass Lewis' clients and other interested parties informed of current corporate governance developments and regulatory trends. The information contained herein should not be construed as legal or investment advice. Glass Lewis analyzes issues it believes may be of interest to its subscribers and makes recommendations as to how Glass Lewis believes institutional shareholders should approach such issues. While Glass Lewis may mention certain companies in its blog postings, Glass Lewis never comments on the investment merits of the securities issued by the subject companies. Therefore, none of the information posted through this blog should be construed as a recommendation to invest in, purchase, or sell any securities or other property. All recommendations stated herein must be construed solely as statements of opinion, and not as statements of fact, and may be revised based on additional information or any other reason at any time.
The information contained in each blog posting is based on publicly available information. While Glass Lewis exercises reasonable care to ensure that all information included in this blog is accurate and is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, no representations or warranties express or implied, are made as to the accuracy or completeness of any information included herein. In addition, Glass Lewis shall not be liable for any losses or damages arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use or inability to use any such information.
Glass Lewis expects readers of its blog possess sufficient experience and knowledge to make their own decisions entirely independent of any information contained in Glass Lewis’ blog postings. Subscribers are ultimately and solely responsible for making their own decisions. This blog is intended to serve as a complementary source of information and analysis for subscribers in making their own decisions and therefore should not be relied on by subscribers as the sole determinant in making decisions.