Issuer Relations  

Meeting Requests

Meeting Requests

Request an engagement meeting with Glass Lewis' research team. Speak to our analysts about corporate governance topics, ESG, and executive compensation.

Request Meeting

Meeting Requests

One of the most effective ways for companies to engage with Glass Lewis is through direct meetings with our research analysts. We prioritize meeting requests to:

Discuss material concerns relevant to our research.
Foster dialogue about our research policies and methodologies with companies that haven’t previously or recently engaged with us.
Seek clarification on company-specific situations or industry practices

Meetings are categorized into three types and considered based on our issuer relations policies

Issuer Relations Policies

Routine Shareholder Meetings

Request before the publication of shareholder meeting materials and outside of peak proxy season periods.
Detailed meeting agendas are required.

Request Meeting

E&S Shareholder Proposals & Activism

Request after the proposal is submitted and before the company’s proxy statement is filed. Requests are considered during proxy season periods.

Request Meeting

Contested Meetings and M&A Transactions

Requests may be submitted throughout the year, including proxy season periods.
Due to the dynamic nature of these situations, relevant meeting documents and filings will be reviewed before responding to requests.

Request Meeting

Glass Lewis subsidiaries also offer meeting opportunities

Proxinvest Glass Lewis

IVOX Glass Lewis

Erfahren Sie mehr

Additional engagement resources

Ask Questions

to better understand our research policies and practices.

Share investor communications

updates, updates, meeting disclosures, and presentations

Explore Our Insights

Visit Our Resource Center

Glass Lewis Submission on APRA’s Governance Review Discussion Paper

Glass Lewis recently provided a submission to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in response to its Governance Review Discussion Paper.

Glass Lewis Submission on APRA’s Governance Review Discussion Paper

Glass Lewis recently provided a submission to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in response to its Governance Review Discussion Paper.

Fuji Media & Keisei Electric Railway

Japanese companies continue to face heightened levels of shareholder activism.This week, investors have raised questions about board composition, governance practices and the financial/capital strategy at both Fuji Media and Keisei Electric Railway.

Fuji Media & Keisei Electric Railway

Japanese companies continue to face heightened levels of shareholder activism.This week, investors have raised questions about board composition, governance practices and the financial/capital strategy at both Fuji Media and Keisei Electric Railway.

How Glass Lewis Helps Investors Meet the UN PRI Principles and Reporting Requirements

As the world’s largest responsible investing initiative, with over 5,000 investor signatories and €130 trillion in assets under management, the UN PRI reporting exercise (closing on July 30th) represents an important undertaking for investors globally. As a trusted partner to the global investment community, Glass Lewis provides solutions that help investors implement these principles — from voting research and custom engagement services to streamlined stewardship tracking and reporting.

How Glass Lewis Helps Investors Meet the UN PRI Principles and Reporting Requirements

As the world’s largest responsible investing initiative, with over 5,000 investor signatories and €130 trillion in assets under management, the UN PRI reporting exercise (closing on July 30th) represents an important undertaking for investors globally. As a trusted partner to the global investment community, Glass Lewis provides solutions that help investors implement these principles — from voting research and custom engagement services to streamlined stewardship tracking and reporting.

Bridging the Gap: Integrating Proxy Voting and Engagement for Effective Stewardship

In the evolving landscape of investment stewardship, institutional investors are increasingly recognizing the need to harmonize proxy voting and corporate engagement. Historically treated as distinct activities, these disciplines are now seen as complementary levers that, when aligned, can enhance outcomes and long-term value.

Bridging the Gap: Integrating Proxy Voting and Engagement for Effective Stewardship

In the evolving landscape of investment stewardship, institutional investors are increasingly recognizing the need to harmonize proxy voting and corporate engagement. Historically treated as distinct activities, these disciplines are now seen as complementary levers that, when aligned, can enhance outcomes and long-term value.