Regulatory Matters
Regulatory Matters
Glass Lewis actively engages with regulatory bodies around the world and frequently provides them perspectives from the proxy advisory industry, information on our policies and procedures, and input on pending regulations.
.avif)
Glass Lewis Statements and Correspondence
- Submission on Australian Prudential Regulation Authority's Governance Review Discussion Paper - June 2025
- Glass Lewis Letter to Senate Banking Members - June 2025
- Response to the SGX RegCo (Singapore Exchange Regulation) Consultation Paper on Facilitating Shareholder-Requisitioned Meetings
- Response to the Consultation Draft for a 5th Edition of the ASX Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
- Response Letter to Multiple State Treasurers (June 2023)
- Response Letter to Multiple States’ Attorneys General Re: Proxy Advisory Issues (January 2023)
- Comment Letter to U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission on Enhanced Disclosure of ESG Issues (August 2022)
- Comment Letter to U.S. Department of Labor on Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights (December 2021)
- Comment Letter to U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission on Reporting of Proxy Votes (December 2021)
- Comment Letter to Australian Treasury Consultation on Transparency of Proxy Advice (June 1, 2021)
- Comment Letter to U.S. Department of Labor On Fiduciary Duties Regarding Proxy Voting and Shareholder Rights (October 5, 2020)
- Comment Letter to Ontario Markets Modernization Taskforce Regarding Consultation Report – July 2020 (September 7, 2020)
- Comment Letter to SEC Regarding Amendments to Exemptions from the Proxy Rules for Proxy Voting Advice (February 3, 2020)
- Comment Letter to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on SEC Proposed Amendments to Exemptions from the Proxy Rules for Proxy Voting Advice (January 7, 2020)
- Statement on SEC August 2019 Guidance (August 22, 2019)
- Letter on SEC Roundtable on the Proxy Process (November 14, 2018)
- Letter to Senate Banking Committee (June 1, 2018)
- Statement to the House Financial Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government Sponsored Enterprises (May 17, 2016)
- Letter to SEC on “proxy solicitation” (June 30, 2014)
Investor Perspectives on Proxy Advisor Regulation
- Council of Institutional Investors Letter to the SEC requesting extension of comment period (November 15, 2019)
- Council of Institutional Investors Letter to the SEC requesting underlying data and supplementary information (November 14, 2019)
- Council of Institutional Investors Fact Sheet on Proxy Advisory Firms and Shareholder Proposals (Nov. 5, 2019)
- Council of Institutional Investors Letter to the SEC on claims of proxy advisor inaccuracy (October 24, 2019)
- Council of Institutional Investors and 60 Institutional Investors’ Letter to the SEC on the Commission’s August Guidance (October 15, 2019)
- Investment Company Institute Letter on SEC Roundtable (March 15, 2019)
- Investment Adviser Association Letter on SEC Roundtable (December 31, 2018)
- Nell Minow, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation (March 2, 2018)
Government Reports & Pronouncements
United States
- Securities and Exchange Commission Guidance on Investment Advisers’ use of Proxy Advisors (August 21, 2019)
- Securities and Exchange Commission Interpretation and Guidance Regarding the Applicability of the Proxy Rules to Proxy Voting Advice (August 21, 2019)
- Transcript of the Securities and Exchange Commission Roundtable on the Proxy Process (November 15, 2018)
- SEC Staff Legal Bulletin No. 20 on Proxy Voting (June 30, 2014)
- Government Accountability Office Report on Proxy Advisory Firms (November 15, 2016)
Global
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Circular – Procedural Guidelines for Proxy Advisors (August 3, 2020)
- Capital Markets Modernization Taskforce (Ontario, Canada) – Consultation Report (July 2020)
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Report of Working Group on Issues Concerning Proxy Advisors (July 29, 2019)
- Canadian Securities Administrators National Policy 25-201 Guidance for Proxy Advisory Firms (April 30, 2015)
- European Securities and Markets Authority Recommendation for Proxy Advisors to Develop a Code of Conduct (2013)
Proposed Rules and Final Regulations
- U.S. SEC Exemptions from the Proxy Rules for Proxy Voting Advice (July 2020)
- U.S. SEC Supplemental Guidance (July 2020)
- U.S. SEC August 2019 Guidance
- U.S. SEC Proposed Amendments to Resubmission Thresholds (November 2019)
- U.S. SEC Proposed Amendments to Exemptions for Proxy Rules (November 2019)
- SRD II Resource Hub
Academic Studies
- Li, Tao, “Outsourcing Corporate Governance: Conflicts of Interest Within the Proxy Advisory Industry,” 64 Mgmt. Sci. 2951 (2018).
- Dent, Jr., George W., “A Defense of Proxy Advisors,” 2014 Mich. St. L. Rev. 1287 (2014).
- Choi, Stephen; Fisch, Jill E.; and Kahan, Marcel, “The Power of Proxy Advisors: Myth or Reality?,” 59 Emory Law Journal 869 (2010).
Glass Lewis Submission on APRA’s Governance Review Discussion Paper
Glass Lewis recently provided a submission to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in response to its Governance Review Discussion Paper.
Glass Lewis Submission on APRA’s Governance Review Discussion Paper
Glass Lewis recently provided a submission to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in response to its Governance Review Discussion Paper.
Glass Lewis Letter to Senate Banking Committee Members
Glass Lewis is not a political organization and it has no agenda. Instead, we are committed to serving our clients and providing them with objective, reliable, and timely advice.
Glass Lewis Letter to Senate Banking Committee Members
Glass Lewis is not a political organization and it has no agenda. Instead, we are committed to serving our clients and providing them with objective, reliable, and timely advice.
Glass Lewis Response to TX SB 2337
As part of a campaign to attract companies to relocate to, incorporate in, and list on a new Texas-based exchange, the Texas legislature is rushing through a number of corporate governance measures.
Glass Lewis Response to TX SB 2337
As part of a campaign to attract companies to relocate to, incorporate in, and list on a new Texas-based exchange, the Texas legislature is rushing through a number of corporate governance measures.
German Shareholders Push Back on Virtual-Only AGMs
Shareholder meetings that take place early in the year are often a bellwether for the proxy season ahead...
German Shareholders Push Back on Virtual-Only AGMs
Shareholder meetings that take place early in the year are often a bellwether for the proxy season ahead...