N-PX reporting
Comprehensive N-PX Reporting Service
Turnkey solution to fulfill reporting requirements for proxy voting

With expanded SEC requirements, more investors must submit N-PX reports, including 13F filers. Glass Lewis simplifies filing by extracting voting data from our proxy voting platform, Viewpoint, ensuring SEC-compliant accuracy, and collaborating with you for timely, efficient submissions.
Key Features and Benefits
How It Works

The SEC's Form N-PX requires firms to report proxy voting records. Form 13F filers and eligible institutional investment managers meeting Form 13F requirements may also be required to file.
- 2025 reporting period: July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025.
- 2025 filing deadline: August 31, 2025
Complete filings are prepared by our expert team in a compliant format, validated by the SEC, and then reviewed to ensure completeness and accuracy.


Battle Scars on Boards: Gov Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Battle Scars on Boards: Gov Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Skin in the Game: Rem Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Skin in the Game: Rem Highlights from the Remuneration & Governance Forum
The 19th Annual Remuneration & Governance Forum, co-hosted by CGI Glass Lewis and Guerdon Associates, convened on the 18th of March 2025 in Sydney.


Premium Brands Holdings Corporation
By bundling two extremely different proposals into a single vote, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation is arguably disenfranchising not only shareholders but also the company itself – and exposing its board to potential scrutiny.


Premium Brands Holdings Corporation
By bundling two extremely different proposals into a single vote, Premium Brands Holdings Corporation is arguably disenfranchising not only shareholders but also the company itself – and exposing its board to potential scrutiny.