Peer Group
Submission
Peer Group Submission
Submit self-identified peer groups used for executive compensation benchmarking.

Peer Group Submission
Peer submission windows are open twice annually for publicly traded companies in the U.S. and Canada to submit self-identified peer groups used for their executive compensation benchmarking. Self-disclosed peer groups are incorporated into Glass Lewis’ proprietary methodology which drives our executive compensation assessment and the outcome of our executive compensation model.
Relevant companies are notified by email of biannual open window periods. Opt-in to peer submission communications.
Glass Lewis’ Peer Methodology
Glass Lewis has Glass Lewis has a rigorous, state-of-the-art peer methodology that informs our Pay-for-Performance Model, and our Say on Pay recommendations. Beginning with a company’s self-disclosed peers, Glass Lewis then includes investor views on both industry-based and country-based peers, in addition to the company’s peers-of-peers. This approach ensures additional screens based on corporate revenue, market capitalization, and assets; weightings also consider the source and frequency of confirmation, and peer rankings are based on a strength-of-connection approach that considers all potential peers, not just those resulting from the network effects of corporate disclosures.
Related Products and Services


Dispelling Uncertainty: A Structured Approach for Public Companies Managing Shareholder Vote Risk
This article explains how companies can manage shareholder vote risk through a structured approach that better supports effective decision-making and drives stronger voting and engagement outcomes.


Dispelling Uncertainty: A Structured Approach for Public Companies Managing Shareholder Vote Risk
This article explains how companies can manage shareholder vote risk through a structured approach that better supports effective decision-making and drives stronger voting and engagement outcomes.


Executive Perspective | Unequal Voting Rights: Opportunity vs. Influence
Glass Lewis CEO Bob Mann shares his Executive Perspective on the corporate governance debate over multi-class share structures and unequal voting rights, with a focus on balancing opportunity against influence.


Executive Perspective | Unequal Voting Rights: Opportunity vs. Influence
Glass Lewis CEO Bob Mann shares his Executive Perspective on the corporate governance debate over multi-class share structures and unequal voting rights, with a focus on balancing opportunity against influence.


Technology-Related Proposals in the AI Era: Notes from the 2026 Proxy Season
This article covers some notable examples of AI-related shareholder proposals from the 2026 proxy season that touch on consumer data privacy, AI data sourcing, energy demand, water use and electricity costs.


Technology-Related Proposals in the AI Era: Notes from the 2026 Proxy Season
This article covers some notable examples of AI-related shareholder proposals from the 2026 proxy season that touch on consumer data privacy, AI data sourcing, energy demand, water use and electricity costs.


A Practical Guide to Using Climate Intelligence in Investment Research
This guide explores how Glass Lewis’ Climate Intelligence can support investment research by helping investors identify whether climate transition exposure represents a financial risk, or opportunity, for investee companies.


A Practical Guide to Using Climate Intelligence in Investment Research
This guide explores how Glass Lewis’ Climate Intelligence can support investment research by helping investors identify whether climate transition exposure represents a financial risk, or opportunity, for investee companies.