Peer Group
Submission
Peer Group Submission
Submit self-identified peer groups used for executive compensation benchmarking.
Opt-in to Peer Submission Communications.
.avif)
Peer Group Submission
Peer submission windows are open twice annually for publicly traded companies in the U.S. and Canada to submit self-identified peer groups used for their executive compensation benchmarking. Self-disclosed peer groups are incorporated into Glass Lewis’ proprietary methodology which drives our executive compensation assessment and the outcome of our executive compensation model.
Relevant companies are notified by email of biannual open window periods. Opt-in to peer submission communications.
Glass Lewis’ Peer Methodology
Glass Lewis has Glass Lewis has a rigorous, state-of-the-art peer methodology that informs our Pay-for-Performance Model, and our Say on Pay recommendations. Beginning with a company’s self-disclosed peers, Glass Lewis then includes investor views on both industry-based and country-based peers, in addition to the company’s peers-of-peers. This approach ensures additional screens based on corporate revenue, market capitalization, and assets; weightings also consider the source and frequency of confirmation, and peer rankings are based on a strength-of-connection approach that considers all potential peers, not just those resulting from the network effects of corporate disclosures.
Related Products and Services


Glass Lewis Submission on APRA’s Governance Review Discussion Paper
Glass Lewis recently provided a submission to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in response to its Governance Review Discussion Paper.


Glass Lewis Submission on APRA’s Governance Review Discussion Paper
Glass Lewis recently provided a submission to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) in response to its Governance Review Discussion Paper.


Fuji Media & Keisei Electric Railway
Japanese companies continue to face heightened levels of shareholder activism.This week, investors have raised questions about board composition, governance practices and the financial/capital strategy at both Fuji Media and Keisei Electric Railway.


Fuji Media & Keisei Electric Railway
Japanese companies continue to face heightened levels of shareholder activism.This week, investors have raised questions about board composition, governance practices and the financial/capital strategy at both Fuji Media and Keisei Electric Railway.


How Glass Lewis Helps Investors Meet the UN PRI Principles and Reporting Requirements
As the world’s largest responsible investing initiative, with over 5,000 investor signatories and €130 trillion in assets under management, the UN PRI reporting exercise (closing on July 30th) represents an important undertaking for investors globally. As a trusted partner to the global investment community, Glass Lewis provides solutions that help investors implement these principles — from voting research and custom engagement services to streamlined stewardship tracking and reporting.


How Glass Lewis Helps Investors Meet the UN PRI Principles and Reporting Requirements
As the world’s largest responsible investing initiative, with over 5,000 investor signatories and €130 trillion in assets under management, the UN PRI reporting exercise (closing on July 30th) represents an important undertaking for investors globally. As a trusted partner to the global investment community, Glass Lewis provides solutions that help investors implement these principles — from voting research and custom engagement services to streamlined stewardship tracking and reporting.


Bridging the Gap: Integrating Proxy Voting and Engagement for Effective Stewardship
In the evolving landscape of investment stewardship, institutional investors are increasingly recognizing the need to harmonize proxy voting and corporate engagement. Historically treated as distinct activities, these disciplines are now seen as complementary levers that, when aligned, can enhance outcomes and long-term value.


Bridging the Gap: Integrating Proxy Voting and Engagement for Effective Stewardship
In the evolving landscape of investment stewardship, institutional investors are increasingly recognizing the need to harmonize proxy voting and corporate engagement. Historically treated as distinct activities, these disciplines are now seen as complementary levers that, when aligned, can enhance outcomes and long-term value.