Issuer Relations
At Glass Lewis, we value constructive dialogue with the companies we analyze. Our dedicated Issuer Relations Team facilitates communication with listed companies and their advisors to ensure a comprehensive understanding of company perspectives to deliver the most insightful and valuable research for our institutional investor clients.
We are committed to maintaining a constructive dialogue with all stakeholders and we offer multiple channels for engagement to encourage open communication and facilitate a robust exchange of information.
Interact with Glass Lewis throughout the governance cycle
.png)
Market Brief: Examining the SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Rule as a Governance Proposal
This article provides a brief overview of the governance and stewardship debate over reporting frequency.
Market Brief: Examining the SEC’s Semiannual Reporting Rule as a Governance Proposal
This article provides a brief overview of the governance and stewardship debate over reporting frequency.
Stewardship in Action: Engagement Snapshots on Executive Pay Incentives and Peer Groups
This article shows how investment stewardship engagement with a biotech company and an advanced analytics company led to positive outcomes for institutional shareholders.
Stewardship in Action: Engagement Snapshots on Executive Pay Incentives and Peer Groups
This article shows how investment stewardship engagement with a biotech company and an advanced analytics company led to positive outcomes for institutional shareholders.
Tracking Shareholder Proposals and Company Exclusions: Mid-Season Observations
How has the SEC’s new approach to no-action requests impacted the shareholder proposal landscape?
Tracking Shareholder Proposals and Company Exclusions: Mid-Season Observations
How has the SEC’s new approach to no-action requests impacted the shareholder proposal landscape?
Market Brief: What Proxy Voting for Third-Party Tokenized Stocks and ETFs Might Mean for Governance
This article examines how proxy voting for third-party tokenized stocks and ETFs could reshape governance. Though it creates new ways for investors to participate in proxy voting, it also raises unresolved governance questions around ownership rights and voting eligibility, transparency, intermediary accountability, and fiduciary responsibility.
Market Brief: What Proxy Voting for Third-Party Tokenized Stocks and ETFs Might Mean for Governance
This article examines how proxy voting for third-party tokenized stocks and ETFs could reshape governance. Though it creates new ways for investors to participate in proxy voting, it also raises unresolved governance questions around ownership rights and voting eligibility, transparency, intermediary accountability, and fiduciary responsibility.