Peer Group
Submission
Peer Group Submission
Submit self-identified peer groups used for executive compensation benchmarking.

Peer Group Submission
Peer submission windows are open twice annually for publicly traded companies in the U.S. and Canada to submit self-identified peer groups used for their executive compensation benchmarking. Self-disclosed peer groups are incorporated into Glass Lewis’ proprietary methodology which drives our executive compensation assessment and the outcome of our executive compensation model.
Relevant companies are notified by email of biannual open window periods. Opt-in to peer submission communications.
Glass Lewis’ Peer Methodology
Glass Lewis has Glass Lewis has a rigorous, state-of-the-art peer methodology that informs our Pay-for-Performance Model, and our Say on Pay recommendations. Beginning with a company’s self-disclosed peers, Glass Lewis then includes investor views on both industry-based and country-based peers, in addition to the company’s peers-of-peers. This approach ensures additional screens based on corporate revenue, market capitalization, and assets; weightings also consider the source and frequency of confirmation, and peer rankings are based on a strength-of-connection approach that considers all potential peers, not just those resulting from the network effects of corporate disclosures.
Related Products and Services


Meeting Notes From Japan: Examples of Shareholder Activism
Explore recent shareholder activism trends in Japan with three examples of notable meetings where investors influenced the AGM agenda in 2025.


Meeting Notes From Japan: Examples of Shareholder Activism
Explore recent shareholder activism trends in Japan with three examples of notable meetings where investors influenced the AGM agenda in 2025.


Supporting Effective Investment Stewardship Part Two: Unifying Engagement Technology and Programs
This article explores how purpose-built technology and external engagement support can help investors with more structured, scalable tracking of engagement activities and outcomes.


Supporting Effective Investment Stewardship Part Two: Unifying Engagement Technology and Programs
This article explores how purpose-built technology and external engagement support can help investors with more structured, scalable tracking of engagement activities and outcomes.


Guide: Anticipating and Addressing Shareholder Views on Executive Pay
This guide explains how companies can take a methodical approach to pre-season executive pay planning.


Guide: Anticipating and Addressing Shareholder Views on Executive Pay
This guide explains how companies can take a methodical approach to pre-season executive pay planning.


Analyzing Board Composition in the US: What the Latest Data Says on Director Independence, Commitments and Diversity
This article provides an overview of the board trends that we observed, covering board independence, overcommitment, and gender, racial and ethnic diversity, and discussion of how these findings align with the results of our 2025 Policy Survey.


Analyzing Board Composition in the US: What the Latest Data Says on Director Independence, Commitments and Diversity
This article provides an overview of the board trends that we observed, covering board independence, overcommitment, and gender, racial and ethnic diversity, and discussion of how these findings align with the results of our 2025 Policy Survey.