Vote Disclosure
Vote Disclosure Services Tailored for Investor Needs
Demonstrate Transparency by Sharing Your Proxy Voting Practices with Stakeholders

Amid growing expectations for transparency, investors are seeking help to efficiently share their voting data with stakeholders. Glass Lewis’ Vote Disclosure service provides a dynamic dashboard that pulls voting data from Viewpoint to support stewardship reporting and fulfill client mandates.
Key Features and Benefits
Comprehensive Voting Insights
With voting results updated daily, Vote Disclosure enables your firm to share deeper insights about its voting record, Share insights into voting activities with summary statistics on eligible and voted meetings by region, company, meeting data and proposal type.
Interactive and Branded Display
Visualize up to three years of Viewpoint voting data with interactive charts, tables and graphs, providing stakeholders with relevant insights into your voting practices. Showcase data on a website branded with your logo and colors for a professional, engaging experience.
Comply with Stewardship Disclosure Standards
Our Vote Disclosure reporting service currently support clients in meeting best practice standards for active owners including:
- United Nations Principles of Responsible Investment (UNPRI)
- Australian Government Stronger Super
- FSC Standards No.13 and No.20
- UK Stewardship Code
- Japan Stewardship Code
- Swiss Stewardship Code


The Current Strategic Landscape for Investment Stewardship
Based on findings from the 2026 Investment Stewardship Survey Report, this article covers current engagement priorities, operational approaches to stewardship, criteria for prioritization of engagement themes, and key areas of improvement.


The Current Strategic Landscape for Investment Stewardship
Based on findings from the 2026 Investment Stewardship Survey Report, this article covers current engagement priorities, operational approaches to stewardship, criteria for prioritization of engagement themes, and key areas of improvement.


External Shareholder Nomination Committees in Nordic Market Practice
This article provides an overview of how external nominating committees function and how they differ from board committees.


External Shareholder Nomination Committees in Nordic Market Practice
This article provides an overview of how external nominating committees function and how they differ from board committees.


A Conversation About Evaluating AI-Driven Proxy Voting Systems
This discussion serves as a companion to AI and the Fiduciary Test, the first in a series of white papers on enterprise-level, investment-grade AI in proxy voting.


A Conversation About Evaluating AI-Driven Proxy Voting Systems
This discussion serves as a companion to AI and the Fiduciary Test, the first in a series of white papers on enterprise-level, investment-grade AI in proxy voting.


A Look at France’s Approach to Executive Remuneration Voting
This article sets out the details and background of France’s approach to executive remuneration governance, explores how it compares to regional peers in Europe, and examines shareholder voting data to discuss how this approach works in practice.


A Look at France’s Approach to Executive Remuneration Voting
This article sets out the details and background of France’s approach to executive remuneration governance, explores how it compares to regional peers in Europe, and examines shareholder voting data to discuss how this approach works in practice.


