Malaysia’s IPO Boom Short Lived?
Malaysia’s financial markets have had a good year in 2012, with IPOs alone raising $7.3 billion, which constituted 25% of all new listings in Asia-Pacific region. In value terms, Malaysia ranked third place in the world in IPOs after the U.S. and China. However, while Malaysia’s impressive number of IPOs was cheered by many, some observers question whether the same results can be replicated in the future, as the IPO boom has been primarily driven by domestic companies and investors.
Malaysia may face significant challenges bolstering its IPOs with foreign enterprises and capital. While a booming economy, Malaysia is not known for solid market infrastructure, which is considered by many to be necessary to attract global companies and investors. However, investors should take note of recent efforts made by the Malaysian regulatory authorities to improve its corporate governance standards. In a recent report published by the Asian Corporate Governance Association (“ACGA”) and CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets, Malaysia ranked fourth in terms of its overall corporate governance score, recognizing the efforts made by the Malaysian regulatory authorities to strengthen and enforce good corporate governance practices. The ACGA highlighted Malaysia’s progress in board reform, shareholder rights, director training and transparency, among other areas. Indeed, to show its commitment to improvement in these areas, Malaysia recently updated its Code of Corporate Governance in order to strengthen “the role of directors as active and responsible fiduciaries.”
This year’s successful IPOs have drawn the world’s attention to Malaysia, and the country now has an opportunity to translate increased interest into increased investment. While Malaysia may have a long way to go to catch up with more advanced Asian markets like Singapore and Hong Kong, continued reforms could appeal to governance-conscious and growth-minded global investors alike, making Malaysia a major IPO hub in the coming years.
© 2019 Glass, Lewis & Co., and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
This blog is for informational purposes only and is updated periodically to keep Glass Lewis' clients and other interested parties informed of current corporate governance developments and regulatory trends. The information contained herein should not be construed as legal or investment advice. Glass Lewis analyzes issues it believes may be of interest to its subscribers and makes recommendations as to how Glass Lewis believes institutional shareholders should approach such issues. While Glass Lewis may mention certain companies in its blog postings, Glass Lewis never comments on the investment merits of the securities issued by the subject companies. Therefore, none of the information posted through this blog should be construed as a recommendation to invest in, purchase, or sell any securities or other property. All recommendations stated herein must be construed solely as statements of opinion, and not as statements of fact, and may be revised based on additional information or any other reason at any time.
The information contained in each blog posting is based on publicly available information. While Glass Lewis exercises reasonable care to ensure that all information included in this blog is accurate and is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, no representations or warranties express or implied, are made as to the accuracy or completeness of any information included herein. In addition, Glass Lewis shall not be liable for any losses or damages arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use or inability to use any such information.
Glass Lewis expects readers of its blog possess sufficient experience and knowledge to make their own decisions entirely independent of any information contained in Glass Lewis’ blog postings. Subscribers are ultimately and solely responsible for making their own decisions. This blog is intended to serve as a complementary source of information and analysis for subscribers in making their own decisions and therefore should not be relied on by subscribers as the sole determinant in making decisions.