Glass Lewis Submission to Bursa Malaysia on Proposed Amendments to Listing Requirements
Glass Lewis has submitted a response to the consultation paper from the Bursa Malaysia on proposed changes to the Main Market and ACE Market Listing Requirements. The changes that Glass Lewis commented on relate to:
- A proposed 50% cap on the issuance of convertible securities;
- Enhancements to issuer disclosure relating to material loan covenants linked to controlling shareholders;
- Enhanced disclosure and transparency pertaining to corporate rescue mechanisms; and
- Increases on the cooling-off periods for independent directors along with subject non-independent directors to a cooling-off period.
As discussed in our response, Glass Lewis generally supports the proposed amendments to the Listing Regulations. Notably, the cap on the issuance of convertible securities could limit dilution to shareholders, while Glass Lewis proposed further shareholder input and voting on the issuance of convertible securities. Further, the increased transparency of disclosure relating to material loan covenants and rescue mechanisms is a step in the right direction, which other markets have also begun to practice. Lastly, the proposed changes to cooling-off periods would see an increase from two to three-years, while non-independent non-executive directors would also be subject to a cooling-off period following a director’s service as an executive director.
You can download our submission to the consultation below. For more information, contact firstname.lastname@example.org
© 2020 Glass, Lewis & Co., and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
This blog is for informational purposes only and is updated periodically to keep Glass Lewis' clients and other interested parties informed of current corporate governance developments and regulatory trends. The information contained herein should not be construed as legal or investment advice. Glass Lewis analyzes issues it believes may be of interest to its subscribers and makes recommendations as to how Glass Lewis believes institutional shareholders should approach such issues. While Glass Lewis may mention certain companies in its blog postings, Glass Lewis never comments on the investment merits of the securities issued by the subject companies. Therefore, none of the information posted through this blog should be construed as a recommendation to invest in, purchase, or sell any securities or other property. All recommendations stated herein must be construed solely as statements of opinion, and not as statements of fact, and may be revised based on additional information or any other reason at any time.
The information contained in each blog posting is based on publicly available information. While Glass Lewis exercises reasonable care to ensure that all information included in this blog is accurate and is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, no representations or warranties express or implied, are made as to the accuracy or completeness of any information included herein. In addition, Glass Lewis shall not be liable for any losses or damages arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use or inability to use any such information.
Glass Lewis expects readers of its blog possess sufficient experience and knowledge to make their own decisions entirely independent of any information contained in Glass Lewis’ blog postings. Subscribers are ultimately and solely responsible for making their own decisions. This blog is intended to serve as a complementary source of information and analysis for subscribers in making their own decisions and therefore should not be relied on by subscribers as the sole determinant in making decisions.