Glass Lewis Publishes its 2012 United States Season Review
Glass Lewis’ U.S. research analysts have examined the vote results from the more than 21,000 proposals on which they provided recommendations during the 2012 proxy season. Their findings have been condensed into a highly accessible and informative report, “United States Season Review 2012.” The report analyzes shareholder voting for director elections and governance-related proposals, as well as Glass Lewis’ vote recommendations.
We also provide an in-depth review of the issues surrounding some of the season’s most high-profile meetings—Chesapeake, Wal-Mart, JP Morgan Chase and Nabors Industries. And we discuss trends in the areas of dual-class structures, exclusive forum provisions, action by written consent and supermajority vote requirements.
In addition, the report summarizes results for say-on-pay votes and shareholder proposals. We also examine equity award proposals that failed to receive majority support and briefly look at the compensation practices of the S&P 500 companies reviewed during proxy season.
While the 2012 proxy season may have seemed “ho-hum” compared to 2011—the first year of say-on-pay—the report identifies several instances where shareholders made significant strides in gaining important rights at their companies, as well as others where the shareholders have more work to do.
Glass Lewis clients can access the 2012 issue of the United States Season Review 2012 at GlassLewis.net, or they can contact their Client Services Manager.
All others who wish to view the report can send a request to purchase the report via firstname.lastname@example.org
© 2015 Glass, Lewis & Co., Glass Lewis Europe, Ltd., and CGI Glass Lewis Pty Ltd. (collectively, “Glass Lewis”). All Rights Reserved.
This blog is for informational purposes only and is updated periodically to keep Glass Lewis' clients and other interested parties informed of current corporate governance developments and regulatory trends. The information contained herein should not be construed as legal or investment advice. Glass Lewis analyzes issues it believes may be of interest to its subscribers and makes recommendations as to how Glass Lewis believes institutional shareholders should approach such issues. While Glass Lewis may mention certain companies in its blog postings, Glass Lewis never comments on the investment merits of the securities issued by the subject companies. Therefore, none of the information posted through this blog should be construed as a recommendation to invest in, purchase, or sell any securities or other property. All recommendations stated herein must be construed solely as statements of opinion, and not as statements of fact, and may be revised based on additional information or any other reason at any time.
The information contained in each blog posting is based on publicly available information. While Glass Lewis exercises reasonable care to ensure that all information included in this blog is accurate and is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, no representations or warranties express or implied, are made as to the accuracy or completeness of any information included herein. In addition, Glass Lewis shall not be liable for any losses or damages arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use or inability to use any such information.
Glass Lewis expects readers of its blog possess sufficient experience and knowledge to make their own decisions entirely independent of any information contained in Glass Lewis’ blog postings. Subscribers are ultimately and solely responsible for making their own decisions. This blog is intended to serve as a complementary source of information and analysis for subscribers in making their own decisions and therefore should not be relied on by subscribers as the sole determinant in making decisions.