Glass Lewis assesses U.S. equity-based compensation plans in the context of potential equity value creation, utilizing an in-house model that evaluates plans based on three categories: program size and granting history; program cost; and program features.
Following an extensive off-season review of this model, Glass Lewis has updated certain analyses, rules and calculations. These changes include the following:
- Improved the test that measures the dilutive effects of a company’s past granting history in order to incorporate a three-year weighted average dilution calculation.
- Removed the cost per employee test used in the program cost analyses.
- Added a relative overhang test to better capture the dilutive effects of company equity programs when compared to a specified peer group.
- Modified the valuation process of full-value awards to now use the average of a company’s closing share price over the last four quarters.
- Other internal modifications and adjustments.
Glass Lewis regularly reviews the methodologies and analyses utilized in our research. Through engagement with issuers and stakeholders, outreach at seminars and conferences, and evaluation of data and information collected throughout the year, among other considerations, Glass Lewis formulates new ideas and perspectives on the issues we cover.
After considerable back-testing and evaluation of these new techniques, Glass Lewis has determined that the revised methodology provides a more balanced approach in measuring dilution and cost, and incorporates a longer term assessment of a company’s granting history. These changes provide our analysts and clients with refined tools for examining equity-based compensation programs.
Please click here for more information regarding Glass Lewis’ equity-based compensation analysis.
You can also request to engage with Glass Lewis by clicking here.
Disclaimer
© 2018 Glass, Lewis & Co., and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved.
This blog is for informational purposes only and is updated periodically to keep Glass Lewis' clients and other interested parties informed of current corporate governance developments and regulatory trends. The information contained herein should not be construed as legal or investment advice. Glass Lewis analyzes issues it believes may be of interest to its subscribers and makes recommendations as to how Glass Lewis believes institutional shareholders should approach such issues. While Glass Lewis may mention certain companies in its blog postings, Glass Lewis never comments on the investment merits of the securities issued by the subject companies. Therefore, none of the information posted through this blog should be construed as a recommendation to invest in, purchase, or sell any securities or other property. All recommendations stated herein must be construed solely as statements of opinion, and not as statements of fact, and may be revised based on additional information or any other reason at any time.
The information contained in each blog posting is based on publicly available information. While Glass Lewis exercises reasonable care to ensure that all information included in this blog is accurate and is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, no representations or warranties express or implied, are made as to the accuracy or completeness of any information included herein. In addition, Glass Lewis shall not be liable for any losses or damages arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use or inability to use any such information.
Glass Lewis expects readers of its blog possess sufficient experience and knowledge to make their own decisions entirely independent of any information contained in Glass Lewis’ blog postings. Subscribers are ultimately and solely responsible for making their own decisions. This blog is intended to serve as a complementary source of information and analysis for subscribers in making their own decisions and therefore should not be relied on by subscribers as the sole determinant in making decisions.
Glass Lewis RSS