Proxy Talk: NYC Comptroller’s Vote No Campaign at NRG
Glass Lewis hosted a Proxy Talk call with Michael Garland of the New York City Comptroller to discuss his office’s vote no campaign at the annual meeting of NRG Energy, which is to be held on April 27.
On April 7, the New York City Comptroller filed an exempt solicitation detailing its decision to oppose Barry Smitherman, a director nominee at NRG who joined the board in February of this year as a part of a settlement with Elliot Management Corporation. In this Proxy Talk, we discuss the rationale behind this vote no campaign, why they targeted Mr. Smitherman, the Comptroller’s engagement with NRG, and a shareholder proposal filed by the Comptroller on which shareholders will vote at NRG’s upcoming meeting.
You can listen to the audio here.
- Michael Garland, the Assistant Comptroller for Corporate Governance and Responsible Investment for the Office of the New York City Comptroller
- Courteney Keatinge (moderator), Director of Environmental, Social and Governance Research at Glass Lewis
Note: Glass Lewis believes that hearing from all sides is important, and reached out to NRG Energy to include the board’s perspective in this Proxy Talk; however they did not choose to participate.
- Welcome 0:50
- Michael Garland introduces himself and the NRG campaign 1:37
- Background on the exempt solicitation 2:20
- Michael’s take on the board agreements 5:31
- Was voting against other directors a consideration? 7:15
- Smitherman’s skills and NRG’s strategic direction 10:20
- Is proxy access a consideration? 11:30
- Smitherman’s views on climate change 13:35
- Any problematic actions so far? 15:24
- Smitherman’s fit with the company 17:00
- NYC engagement with NRG 18:07
- Additional resources and follow-up 21:15
- Wrap-up 22:19
© 2016 Glass, Lewis & Co., and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. This blog is for informational purposes only and is updated periodically to keep Glass Lewis' clients and other interested parties informed of current corporate governance developments and regulatory trends. The information contained herein should not be construed as legal or investment advice. Glass Lewis analyzes issues it believes may be of interest to its subscribers and makes recommendations as to how Glass Lewis believes institutional shareholders should approach such issues. While Glass Lewis may mention certain companies in its blog postings, Glass Lewis never comments on the investment merits of the securities issued by the subject companies. Therefore, none of the information posted through this blog should be construed as a recommendation to invest in, purchase, or sell any securities or other property. All recommendations stated herein must be construed solely as statements of opinion, and not as statements of fact, and may be revised based on additional information or any other reason at any time.
The information contained in each blog posting is based on publicly available information. While Glass Lewis exercises reasonable care to ensure that all information included in this blog is accurate and is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, no representations or warranties express or implied, are made as to the accuracy or completeness of any information included herein. In addition, Glass Lewis shall not be liable for any losses or damages arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use or inability to use any such information.
Glass Lewis expects readers of its blog possess sufficient experience and knowledge to make their own decisions entirely independent of any information contained in Glass Lewis’ blog postings. Subscribers are ultimately and solely responsible for making their own decisions. This blog is intended to serve as a complementary source of information and analysis for subscribers in making their own decisions and therefore should not be relied on by subscribers as the sole determinant in making decisions.